November 2006
Technical Guidance Notes –
Boundary Line Sites
By:- Martin Radford, National
Sales & Marketing Manager Conceptually,
waterproofing solutions should be kept as simple as
possible. However, reinforced concrete structures built
against the site’s boundary line can prove difficult
and complex for traditional waterproofing systems.
So how can you simplify your waterproofing strategy
for today’s concrete structures built on boundary
lines, and what are the waterproofing strategies available
to you?
For many reasons such as ground conditions, land restrictions
and utilisation of space, many of today’s structures
are built up to the boundary line generally formed using
concrete or sheet piles. These forms of construction
provide little or no working space which limits your
waterproofing options to the following:
(i) Pre-applied
waterproofing using the piled structure
as the back shuttering, or
(ii) Waterproofing
the structure internally
For the purpose of this article we will concentrate
on pre-applied systems. For more information on waterproofing
the structure internally, click here.
As outlined in BS 8102:1990 Code of Practice for the
protection of structures against water from the ground,
there are a number of important considerations that
should be ascertained at this point.
• It is important to understand the client’s
expectations, the proposed usage of the basement and
any possible change of use in the future,
• What has the site investigation told you about
the geology of the site? For instance, where is the
water table and how free draining is the soil? Also,
• Is it possible to install effective sub-soil
drainage throughout the site?
These considerations will influence the selection and
design of your waterproofing strategy.
Pre-applied Waterproofing
Currently, there are three generic forms of pre-applied
membranes:
• Sodium Bentonite Geo-composite membranes
• Pressure sensitive adhesive laminates and
• Mechanically bonded plastic laminates.
Each generic system has its attributes and limitations
and it is important that these are considered and fully
understood prior to selection.
Pre-applied
waterproofing systems can be easily applied
throughout the horizontal plain to either well compacted
ground, sand or concrete blinding layer. It is important
that the system bonds directly to the poured concrete
to prevent water tracking between the concrete and the
membrane and to ensure it remains integral with the
structure, should the adjacent ground or building be
removed. It is also important that the chosen system
has self healing qualities as it will not be protected
during the placement of the reinforcement or the concrete.
When applied vertically, consideration should be given
to which substrate the membrane can be applied. Some
systems, such as Sodium
Bentonite membranes, can be applied directly
to the concrete or sheet piles prior to pouring the
concrete, whereas other systems may require some form
of additional permanent shuttering.
The levels of substrate/surface preparation required
for pre-applied membranes should be considered as this
may affect the membrane’s overall performance.
For instance, removal of irregular finishes to concrete
piles, stability of infill between contiguous piles
and effective sealing of cleats between sheet piles.
Another important consideration is how to continue the
waterproofing system up to DPC level once the pre-applied
system reaches ground level. The detailing of the pile
capping beams is critical to the success of the waterproofing
strategy and consideration should be given to using
products from one manufacturer at this point to ensure
one single point of responsibility.
The design team should accept that a basement structure
will be subjected to hydrostatic water pressure at some
point in its life therefore, to conform with BS8102:1990,
consideration should be given to the provision of effective
sub soil drainage, which can be difficult with boundary
line construction.
However, the positive effect of adequate sub soil drainage
cannot be under-estimated as it will significantly reduce
the risk of water ingress and enhance the performance
of the waterproofing strategy.
Finally, if the water table is categorised as permanently
high and the long term effectiveness of sub soil drainage
cannot be guaranteed or is unfeasible to install, the
severity of the risk increases and it would be prudent
to contact a specialist waterproofing manufacturer to
assist in the design of the waterproofing strategy combining
both internal
and external
solutions.
Further information about
the subjects discussed in this article is available
by contacting technical@riw.co.uk
|